• Users Online: 363
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 97-102

Polymicrobial community-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation: A case series


1 Respiratory Diseases Unit, Hospital of Sestri Levante, Genova, Italy
2 Department of Pneumology, Institut Clinic del Tórax, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, SGR 911, Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias (Ciberes), Barcelona, Spain
3 Facultad de Medicina, Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de, Puebla, Mexico

Date of Web Publication24-Sep-2015

Correspondence Address:
Nicolini Antonello
Respiratory Diseases Unit, via Terzi 43, 16039 Sestri Levante
Italy
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2225-6482.166080

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Polymicrobial pneumonia may cause by combinations of respiratory viruses and bacteria in a host. Colonization by Streptococcus pneumoniae was associated with increased risk of Intensive Care Unit admission or death in the setting of influenza infection whereas the colonization by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus coinfection was associated with severe disease and death in adults and children. The principal association of pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is bacteria and viral coinfection and accounts approximately on 39% of microbiological diagnosed cases of CAP. The emergency of influenza virus H1N1 in 2009 caused the first pandemic in more than 40 years. Several studies found bacterial coinfection in a quarter and one-half of influenza infections, the pathogens more frequent isolates were S. pneumoniae and S. aureus mixed pneumonia in all patient groups. The high rate of viral bacterial infection in CAP, should suggest the consideration of new treatments, also during influenza season, the rapid detection of influenza virus (A or B) may allow physician the effective use of neuraminidase inhibitors within 36-48 h of symptoms onset, reducing the complication of secondary bacterial infection. On the other hand, prevention of mixed infection by influenza and pneumococcal vaccine should be addressed. The differential clinical diagnosis between a viral and a bacterial CAP is not easy: No clinical signs or radiological findings help the clinician to suspicious the diagnosis. In this case series, we report five different cases of severe polymicrobial CAP: All of them required mechanical ventilation: Invasive the first two and noninvasive ventilation the last three cases.

Keywords: Mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, polymicrobial community-acquired pneumonia, severe respiratory failure


How to cite this article:
Grazia PI, Catia C, Flores K, Antonello N. Polymicrobial community-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation: A case series. Community Acquir Infect 2015;2:97-102

How to cite this URL:
Grazia PI, Catia C, Flores K, Antonello N. Polymicrobial community-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation: A case series. Community Acquir Infect [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Sep 18];2:97-102. Available from: http://www.caijournal.com/text.asp?2015/2/3/97/166080


  Introduction Top


The 2009 H1N1 virus rapidly spread to several countries, and in July 2009, the World Health Organization declared that infections due to 2009 H1N1 virus had reached pandemic level. [1]

As the pandemic of 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus progressed complicated with pneumonia, more patients required hospitalization. [2]

Pandemic influenza virus has been implicated in serious lower airways illness and death in subjects both with and without underlying medical conditions. [3]

Bacterial pneumonia in association with influenza has been considered an important factor leading to poor patient outcomes in prior pandemics. [2]

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the leading cause of death from infectious diseases. The mortality rates are approximately 1% for outpatients and as high as 14% for hospitalized patients; mortality rates are even higher for those who require hospitalization in Intensive Care Units (ICU). [4],[5]

The role of bacterial coinfection in complicating the clinical course of H1N1 influenza virus-associated pneumonia is poorly known, although it is often considered a cause of excess morbidity and mortality in CAP. [6] Bacterial coinfection is known to increase the severity of H1N1 influenza. Past pandemics have been associated with Staphylococcus aureus which can lead to severe infection. Increasingly coinfection with Streptococcus pneumoniae has been recognized with H1N1 influenza. [7]

Bilateral pneumonia is a risk factor for the need for respiratory support and death. Development of respiratory complications confers further risk of morbidity.

Traditionally, viral pneumonia is considered less severe than bacterial CAP. However, with the influenza A H1N1 outbreak in 2009, this assertion underwent a significant change because most of the infected individuals progressed to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and in many cases, death. [8],[9]

Acute viral pneumonia is an important cause of acute lung injury (ALI), although not enough is known about the exact incidence of viral infection in ALI. Polymerase chain reaction-based assays, direct fluorescent antigen assays, and viral cultures can detect viruses in samples from the human respiratory tract, but the presence of the virus does not prove it to be a pathogen, nor does it give information regarding the interaction of viruses with the host immune response and bacterial flora of the respiratory tract. The severe acute respiratory syndrome cause by H1N1 influenza pandemic provided a better understanding of how viral pathogens mediate lung injury. Although the virus initially infects the respiratory epithelium, the relative role of epithelial damage and endothelial dysfunction has not been well-defined. The inflammatory host immune response to H1N1 infection is a major contributor to lung injury. The lessons learned from the pandemic outbreaks of H1N1 capture key principles of virally mediated ALI. There are pathogen-specific pathways underlying virally mediated ALI that converge onto a common end pathway resulting in diffuse alveolar damage. In terms of therapy, lung protective ventilation is the cornerstone of supportive care. There is little evidence that corticosteroids are beneficial, and they might be harmful. Future therapeutic strategies may be targeted to specific pathogens, the pathogenetic pathways in the host immune response, or enhancing repair and regeneration of tissue damage. [10]

ARDS is defined as an acute inflammatory syndrome characterized with bilateral parenchymal lung infiltrates on chest radiograph and PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio <200 resulting from causes other than acute left ventricular dysfunction. Inflammatory lung lesions may be induced by different disorders, with sepsis being the leading cause of ARDS. [11]

Influenza A/H1N1 infection seems to be responsible for the development of extremely severe type of ARDS with poor response to routine treatment. Despite great progress in the management of ARDS with novel agents and sophisticated techniques, including antimicrobial drugs, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), prostaglandins, nitric oxide, prostacyclin, exogenous surfactant administration, and activated protein C, supportive treatment-based mostly on advanced mechanical ventilation in the ICU seems to be the most important for the prognosis.

As already mentioned significant fraction of seasonal and in particular pandemic influenza deaths are attributed to secondary bacterial infections. The dysregulated inflammation process caused by viral and bacterial factors produced in pneumonia in the lungs contribute to the pathogenesis of polymicrobial infection and predisposition of the host to a secondary bacterial infection.

Pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infection has been shown to affect lower airways causing serious illness and death in patients with underlying medical conditions such as asthma, diabetes, heart, lung, and neurological diseases and pregnancy. Similar outcomes have been reported in previously healthy individuals although predictive factors for severe disease in this patient group have not been identified. [3]

We report five different cases of severe polymicrobial CAP: All of them required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) the first two or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) ventilation the last three cases.


  Case reports Top


Case 1: Streptococcus pneumoniae + influenza virus A (H1N1)

A 43-year-old man, presented on January 2011 at the Emergency Department (ED) for 6-day history of fever, cough, and progressive dyspnea. He presented with acute respiratory failure (ARF) (FiO 2 50%) and septic shock. Physician started NIV and the patient presented current alcohol abuse and no comorbidities. Chest X-ray showed alveolar opacity in the upper right lobe (URL) at admission [Figure 1], in the next 24 h there were a progression of infiltrates and a new radiological control showed bilateral infiltrates. The laboratory studies on admission revealed elevated C-reactive protein 21.5 mg/dL, leukocytes 19.0 × 10 9 /L with neutrophils 75%, and lymphocytopenia 2%. Empirical therapy was started with levofloxacin + amoxicillin/clavulanate. Blood culture, urinary antigen, and sputum sample taken at admission were negative, nasopharyngeal swab was positive for influenza A virus H1N1, tracheal aspirate was positive for S. pneumoniae. On day 2, the patient needed IMV for progressive ARF. Oseltamivir was added and change the antibiotic regimen to piperacilin tazobactam + levofloxacin.
Figure 1: Chest X-ray — alveolar opacity in the upper right lobe

Click here to view


New chest X-ray in the next 48 h showed ARDS despite the patients have FIO 2 100% and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 14 cmH 2 O in prone position.

On day 4, ECMO was started with improving of respiratory assessment. On day 9, the patient presented renal failure (creatinine 2.1 mg/dL), hepatic insufficiency (aspartate aminotransferase 12,339 AU/L, alanine transaminase 1684 AU/L), and lactate dehydrogenase 29,314 AU/L, hemofiltration was started.

Finally, the patient presented clinical deterioration with refractory respiratory insufficiency, hemodynamic instability, and multiorganic failure and died on day 15 th .

Case 2: Pseudomona aeruginosa multi-drug resistant + influenza virus A H1N1 + Stenotrophomona maltophilia

A 78-year-old woman, presented on January 2015 at the ED for 10-day history of fever, cough with purulent expectoration, and progressive dyspnea. The patient presented arterial hypertension, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, chronic cardiac disease, and severe obesity.

On admission physical examination revealed tachypnea (breathing frequency breaths 44 m'). Laboratory data revealed marked elevation of inflammation and infectious parameters (leukocytes 20.10 × 10 9 /L, with neutrophils 77%, lymphocytes 13%, C-reactive protein 13 mg/dL, sodium 137 mEq/L, and potassium 4.3 mEq/L). Arterial blood gases (ABG) analysis showed hypoxemic respiratory failure (PaO 2 55 mmHg, PaCO 2 35 mmHg, and pH 7.33). The chest X-ray revealed an infiltrate in the right lower lung and one in left lower lung, [Figure 2]. In the next 24 h, there was a progression of infiltrates with ARDS and NIV was started. Empirical therapy was started with levofloxacin 500 mg/12 h + ceftriaxone 2 g/24 h. Blood culture, urinary antigen, and sputum sample taken at admission were negative, nasopharyngeal swab was positive for influenza A virus H1N1, bronchoaspirate was positive for multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Oseltamivir was added and the antibiotic regimen changed to meropenem 1 g/8 h + levofloxacin. Patient presented respiratory failure, septic shock, and IMV was started.
Figure 2: Chest X-ray — infiltrate in the right lower lung and one in left lower lung

Click here to view


Acute renal failure occurred (creatinine 1.66). Hemofiltration was started on day 3. The patient was in prone position.

On day 5, fibrobronchoscopy was necessary, obstructing mucus with blood was found and removed. Hemofiltration was stopped, and chest X-ray showed improving of infiltrates. On day 12, the patient was extubated but in the next 48 h she presented respiratory failure and required new intubation, antibiotic treatment was change to linezolid + piperacillin tazobactam + amikacine. Culture of bronchoalveolar lavage was positive to P. aeruginosa and gram positive S. aureus.

Linezolid was stopped. Cryobiopsy was made and showed signs of ARDS and organization. The final results of bronchial aspirate yielded P. aeruginosa MDR and Stenotrophomona maltophilia, treatment was changed to levofloxacin and inhaled colistine.

On day 28, tracheotomy was made; and mechanical ventilation was started, patient clinical conditions worsened and she finally died on day 31.

Case 3: Legionella pneumophila + Streptococcus pneumoniae + Staphylococcus aureus

A 57-year-old man, homeless was taken to the ED after a history of 3 day of fever (39°), cough, and purulent expectoration. He presented alcohol abuse, and untreated chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD). At admission vital signs were: Breathing frequency 38 m', cardiac frequency 124 beats m' arterial pressure 95/55 mmHg. Laboratory data revealed marked elevation of inflammation and infectious parameters (leukocytes 22.30 × 10 9 /L, with neutrophils 85%, lymphocytes 9%, C-reactive protein 20.06 mg/dL, pro-calcitonin 2.5 ng/mL sodium 132 mEq/L, and potassium 3.3 mEq/L). Arterial blood gas analysis showed hypoxemic respiratory failure (PaO 2 45 mmHg, PaCO 2 32 mmHg, and pH 7.49 PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio 214). Chest X-ray revealed opacity in the left lung and computed tomography (CT) of the thorax showed an opacity in the left lower lobe [Figure 3]. The patient was treated with empirical therapy ceftriaxone 2 g/day + levofloxacin 500 mg twice a day and oxygen via Venturi mask 50%. The next 6 h the respiratory conditions worsened as shown by the next ABG (PaO 2 60 PaCO 2 42 pH 7.35 PaO 2 /FiO 2 120). The patient underwent NIV Bilevel PAP IPAP 15 cmH 2 O EPAP 8 cmH 2 O FiO 2 30% with prompt improvement of gas exchange (PaO 2 75 PaCO 2 37 pH 7.37 PaO 2 /FiO 2 250). Urinary antigen was positive both for Legionella pneumophila and S. pneumoniae. Blood culture was positive for S. pneumoniae as well Legionella antibodies. The clinical picture progressively improved. NIV was suspended after a week; after 17 days was observed a normalization of inflammation parameters (leukocytes 5.8 × 10 9 /L, C-reactive protein 0.45) and the patient was discharged.

Case 4: Pseudomonas aeruginosa + Staphylococcus aureus + Streptococcus agalactiae + Candida albicans

A 63-year-old woman was admitted to ED complaining dyspnea, cough, purulent expectoration and fever (39°), poliuria, vomit, and diahrrea. At admission, the clinical picture was as follows: Respiratory breathing 36 m' cardiac frequency 139 beats m' arterial pressure 95/45 mmHg. Laboratory data showed: Leukocytes 19.60 × 10 9 /L, with neutrophils 79%, lymphocytes 12%, C-reactive protein 18.12 mg/dL, pro-calcitonin 2.0 ng/mL, creatinin 1.40 mg/dL (n.v. 0.55-1.2 mg/dL) sodium 144 mEq/L, and potassium 3.4 mEq/L. Arterial blood gas analysis showed hypoxemic respiratory failure (PaO 2 36 mmHg, PaCO 2 30 mmHg, pH 7.48 PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio 171). Chest X-ray and CT of the thorax [Figure 4] revealed an opacitiy in the medio-basal right lung zones. The patients were treated with broad spectrum empirical antibiotics (piperacillin + tazobactam 4.5 g/8 h plus levofloxacin 500 mg/12 h). NIV pressure support (PS) mode was implemented setting PS 10 cmH20, PEEP 8 cmH20 and FiO 2 30%. The ABG performed after 1 h showed: PaO 2 74 PaCO 2 35 pH 7.39 PaO 2 /FiO 2 246. A bronchoaspitate and bronchoalveolar lavage yielded: MDR P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Candida albicans. The patient changed antibiotic therapy: Tigecycline 50 mg/12 h, colistimethate 300 mg/day, and fluconazole 400 mg/day. Five days later clinical picture improved: Leukocytes 8.30 × 10 9 /L, neutrophils 66%, lymphocytes 20% C-reactive protein 3.2 mg/dL, and creatinine 0.69 mg/dL. ABG: PaO 2 68 PaCO 2 38 pH 7.44 PaO 2 /FiO 2 283 on FiO 2 24%. NIV was suspended and patient continued oxygen therapy. Ten days later she was discharged.
Figure 3: Computed tomography of the thorax — opacity in the left lower lobe

Click here to view
Figure 4: Computed tomography of the thorax — opacity in the medio-basal right lung zones

Click here to view


Case 5: Staphylococcus aureus + Enterococcus amnigenus + Enterococcus species

A 71-year-old patient who recently underwent a surgical intervention because of lung cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy was admitted to the Respiratory Diseases Unit complaining fever (38.5°), purulent expectoration, and dyspnea. Clinical examination showed: Respiratory rate 30 cardiac frequency 112 beats m', arterial pressure 100/50 mmHg. ABG in air room showed severe respiratory failure: PaO 2 39 PaCO 2 29 pH 7.48 PaO 2 /FiO 2 185. NIV was started at admission PS 12 cmH20 PEEP 8 cmH20 FiO 2 35%. Chest X-ray and CT of the thorax showed an infiltrate involving the URL with a wide excavation and a small opacity at lower right lobe [Figure 5]. Laboratory findings showed: Leucocytes 10.7 × 10 9 /L, neutrophils 95.4%, lymphocytes 1.9%, C-reactive protein 25.85 mg/dL, pro-calcitonin 1.6, and fibrinogen 857 mg/dL (n.v.180-450 mg/dL). The patient was treated initially with empirical antibiotic therapy: Ceftriaxone 2 g day and levofloxacin 500 mg every 12 h. Blood culture, urinary antigen, and sputum sample taken at admission were negative. Culture of bronchoalveolar lavage was positive for S. aureus methycillin resistant Enterococcus amnigenus and Enterococcus species. The three bacteria were sensitive to tygecycline which was started on day 5 (50 mg/12 h). On day 12, the patient's condition had improved and NIV was stopped. ABG showed: paO 2 78 PaCO 2 39 pH 7.42 PaO 2 /FiO 2 312 in O 2 25%. Laboratory findings were: Leukocytes 8.2 × 10 9 /L, neutrophils 81%, lymphocytes 12%, and C-reactive protein 0.85 mg/dL. On day 18, the patient was discharged.
Figure 5: Computed tomography of the thorax — infiltrate involving the upper right lobe with a wide excavation

Click here to view


The patients alive gave the consent to publish material related to them.


  Discussion Top


The role of mixed pneumonia in CAP has been described in recent years and demonstrated that has a different inflammatory pattern compared to bacterial or viral CAP. [12] In a study conducted by Gutiérrez et al. [13] on 493 adult patients with CAP, polymicrobial infection was found in 5.7% of patients with microbiologically confirmed diagnosis. Polymicrobial infections were seen across all age groups and in patients treated both in hospital and in outpatient clinic. The most common polymicrobial infections were S. pneumoniae with L. pneumophila and S. pneumoniae and Pseudomonas spp. Patients with polymicrobial infections are more likely to have underlying medical conditions and have more severe outcome. [14] In a recent study on 1032 patients admitted with diagnosis of CAP Ishiguro et al. found in a multivariate analysis that age higher than 65, COPD, chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and polymicrobial infection to be significant factors contributing to the severity of CAP. [15] S. pneumoniae was the most frequent co-pathogen in polymicrobial infections as previously reported. [16] Moreover a study addressing polymicrobial infection in 362 patients admitted to ICU with CAP found that 11% of cases were polymicrobial and the presence of chronic respiratory disease and ARDS criteria on admission independent predictors for polymicrobial etiology. [17] Our case series report the most frequent causative organisms in hospitalized patients: [18] It's not clear if the severity of the clinical picture is due to polymicrobial etiology or to causative organism in itself (e.g., L. pneumophila). [19] Undoubtedly bacterial respiratory infection is often preceded by a viral infection which favors the secondary bacterial infection caused by a pathogen colonizing the respiratory mucosa. When a viral respiratory infection occurs, this destroys the respiratory epithelium, thus increases the adhesion of bacteria to the mucosa. [14] The same can happen for atypical bacteria. Micoses and in particular C. albicans increases the virulence of P. aeruginosa and allows S. aureus to evade phagocytosis. [14] For clinicians, it is very important: Combined empirical antimicrobial therapy may reduce mortality: [19] International guidelines have incorporated the idea that CAP could be due to polymicrobial agents in all patients. [14],[19] Rapid detection of influenza may allow physiacians the effective use of neuraminidase inhibitors within 36-48 h of onset of symptoms as well rapid detection of L. pneumophila or S. pneumoniae via urinary test. [20] The suspicion of a polymicrobial CAP is a challenge for clinicians: Actually there is no statistically significant difference in terms of age, immunocompromised status, duration of hospitalization, laboratory parameters (except a higher level of C-reactive protein), [12],[14] and CURB-65 score between polymicrobial and isolated bacterial CAP. [14],[21] Adding molecular methods for detecting polymicrobial infections should can make diagnosis of polymicrobial CAP, therefore shorten the ICU stay or the ventilatory treatment, and improve the outcome.


  Conclusion Top


Our case series suggest that polymicrobial CAP is often associated with more severe disease in adult patients. Rapid detection of the all involved pathogens is paramount for a correct antimicrobial therapy which allows to reduce intensive care stay or mechanical ventilation.

Few laboratory parameters may be useful to suspect a polymicrobial CAP. Further rapid molecular methods should be added to the conventional routinely methods.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D, Ponce de Leon S, Hernandez M, Quiñones-Falconi F, Bautista E, et al. Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico. N Engl J Med 2009;361:680-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Morens DM, Taubenberger JK, Fauci AS. Predominant role of bacterial pneumonia as a cause of death in pandemic influenza: Implications for pandemic influenza preparedness. J Infect Dis 2008;198:962-70.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Castillo-Palencia JP, Laflamme L, Monárrez-Espino J. Occurrence of AH1N1 viral infection and clinical features in symptomatic patients who received medical care during the 2009 influenza pandemic in Central Mexico. BMC Infect Dis 2012;12:363.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44 Suppl 2:S27-72.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mongardon N, Max A, Bouglé A, Pène F, Lemiale V, Charpentier J, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of severe pneumococcal pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit: A multicenter study. Crit Care 2012;16:R155.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Cilloniz C, Ewig S, Menedez R, Ferrer M, Polverino E, Reyer S, et al. Bacterial co-infection with H1N1 infection in patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia. J Infect 2012;65:223-30.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Pedro-Botet ML, Burgos J, Lujan M, Gimenez M, Rello J, Planes A, et al. Impact of Influenza A H1N1 pandemic on invasive pneumococcal disease in adult. Scand J Infect Dis 2014;26:185-92.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Domínguez-Cherit G, Lapinsky SE, Macias AE, Pinto R, Espinosa-Perez L, de la Torre A, et al. Critically Ill patients with 2009 influenza A(H1N1) in Mexico. JAMA 2009;302:1880-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Nardocci P, Gullo CE, Lobo SM. Severe virus influenza A H1N1 related pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia: Differences in the evolution. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2013;25:123-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hendrickson CM, Matthay MA. Viral pathogens and acute lung injury: Investigations inspired by the SARS epidemic and the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2013;34:475-86.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Witczak A, Prystupa A, Kurys-Denis E, Borys M, Czuczwar M, Niemcewicz M, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) complicating influenza A/H1N1v infection - A clinical approach. Ann Agric Environ Med 2013;20:820-2.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bello S, Mincholé E, Fandos S, Lasierra AB, Ruiz MA, Simon AL, et al. Inflammatory response in mixed viral-bacterial community-acquired pneumonia. BMC Pulm Med 2014;14:123.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Gutiérrez F, Masiá M, Rodríguez JC, Mirete C, Soldán B, Padilla S, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia of mixed etiology: Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2005;24:377-83.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Cilloniz C, Civljak R, Nicolini A, Torres A. Polymicrobial community acquired pneumonia: A new entity. Respirology 2015; [In Press].  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ishiguro T, Takayanagi N, Yamaguchi S, Yamakawa H, Nakamoto K, Takaku Y, et al. Etiology and factors contributing to the severity and mortality of community-acquired pneumonia. Intern Med 2013;52:317-24.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Cillóniz C, Ewig S, Polverino E, Marcos MA, Esquinas C, Gabarrús A, et al. Microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia and its relation to severity. Thorax 2011;66:340-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Cillóniz C, Ewig S, Ferrer M, Polverino E, Gabarrús A, Puig de la Bellacasa J, et al. Community-acquired polymicrobial pneumonia in the intensive care unit: Aetiology and prognosis. Crit Care 2011;15:R209.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Viasus D, Marinescu C, Villoslada A, Cordero E, Gálvez-Acebal J, Fariñas MC, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia during the first post-pandemic influenza season: A prospective, multicentre cohort study. J Infect 2013;67:185-93.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Rello J, Gattarello S, Souto J, Sole-Violan J, Valles J, Peredo R, et al. Community-acquired Legionella pneumonia in the intensive care unit: Impact on survival of combined antibiotic therapy. Med Intensiva 2013;37:320-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.
Waterer GW, Rello J, Wunderink RG. Management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:157-64.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Çaglayan Serin D, Pullukçu H, Ciçek C, Sipahi OR, Tasbakan S, Atalay S; Pneumonia Study Group. Bacterial and viral etiology in hospitalized community acquired pneumonia with molecular methods and clinical evaluation. J Infect Dev Ctries 2014;8:510-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case reports
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3618    
    Printed127    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded222    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]